In 2006 Boeing proposed the F-15 Global Strike Eagle, an unmanned variant of the F-15E

Date:

In 2006, Boeing proposed an unmanned variant of the F-15E Strike Eagle, called the F-15 Global Strike Eagle (GSE), for air-launching missiles with the launch vehicle mounted dorsally

The F-15E Strike Eagle, a dual-seat fighter, is capable of targeting both ground and aerial threats.

The F-15E Strike Eagle was created in response to the US Air Force’s (USAF) need for air-to-ground operations. Its first flight took place in St. Louis in December 1986. The Strike Eagle has the capacity to carry 23,000 pounds of both air-to-ground and air-to-air munitions and includes sophisticated navigation as well as an infrared targeting system, shielding the Strike Eagle from enemy defenses. This capability enables the Strike Eagle to operate at low altitudes while achieving high speeds, even in adverse weather conditions or during nighttime.

According to Alert 5, in 2006, Boeing introduced an unmanned version of the F-15E Strike Eagle, named the F-15 Global Strike Eagle (GSE), designed for air-launching missiles with the launch vehicle positioned on top.

F-15-Global-Strike-Eagle
Side view profile showing the revised canopy on the F-15E Global Strike Eagle with one possible launch vehicle payload configuration.

As Tony R. Landis explains in the Air Force Materiel Command History Office article Flashback: F-15 Global Strike Eagle Paths, the concept proposed the F-15 GSE as a low-cost demonstration of global strike capability utilizing a variety of munitions, including the little-known Common Aero Vehicle (CAV). Defined as a maneuverable, hypersonic reentry vehicle that has the capability of dispensing a variety of payloads inside the atmosphere, the CAV concept eventually merged with the Air Force/DARPA Falcon project. Providing a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) launch capability for microsatellites, or microsats, was another mission possibility for the F-15 GSE and, with future upgrades, delivering heavier ballistic and orbital payloads.

Initial studies using the more conventional method of a wing-mounted, or center-mounted payload limited the F-15E to approximately 220 pounds (100 kg) while controlling the diameter and length of the Launch Vehicle (LV). Moving the LV to the top of the F-15E allowed for greater flexibility and larger payload capacity. As proposed, the F-15E GSE required only minimal modifications to strengthen the upper fuselage structure for the top-mounted missile pylon, upgraded Pratt & Whitney F100-229 engines, and lower aft canopy profile. For safety, the Air Force would perform the air-launch mission unmanned, but the aircraft retained a manned capability for ferry missions.

F-15-Global-Strike-Eagle-Paths
The major components of the F-15 Global Strike Eagle launch vehicle are shown in detail.

The F-15 GSE concept made use of off-the-shelf solid rocket motors (SRM), or government-furnished SRM to reduce cost, time, and complexity. Contained between the booster stages were the avionics control and communication packages, electro-mechanical actuation system, batteries, sure-separation system, and flight termination system. Aerodynamic control surfaces added boost phase control, and an aft cone fairing was added to reduce drag during the F-15 boost phase, which ejected shortly after LV separation.

The proposed launch vehicle consisted of off-the-shelf components such as the SR-19, Minutemen II second stage used as the first stage of the launch vehicle. The LV second stage would have used the Orion 50XL, while the third stage used the Orion 38, both from the Pegasus XL launch system. The large LV system would have impaired pilot ejection capability and therefore required an unmanned mission. Existing flight control software from the latest Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) systems would be used to allow unmanned operations.

Benefits of the F-15 GSE system include an operationally responsive space and munitions launch capability, a low-profile mission (looks like other F-15s), a low system development cost, mission flexibility by use of forward basing options and recall capability, and fully upgradable system capabilities.

In the end, the Air Force chose not to pursue this unique air-launched concept. Instead, the service continues to rely on the venerable Boeing B-52 Stratofortress and B-1B Lancer for near-term hypersonic vehicle air-launch capabilities.

Photo by U.S. Air Force

Till Daisd
Till Daisdhttps://www.aviation-wings.com
Till is an aviation enthusiast blogger who has been writing since 2013. He started out writing about personal readings since expanded his blog to include information and stories about all aspects of aviation. Till's blog is a go-to source for anyone interested in learning more about aviation, whether you're a pilot or just a curious onlooker.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Vulcan was one of 3 V-bombers of the RAF. Avro wanted to call it “Ottawa.”

‘While I am extremely proud to call myself an...

Soviets never received any (Iranian) Tomcat but they published this F-14 “booklet”

The Soviets did not need to ‘steal’ or ‘get’...

Where a Soviet MiG-19 pilot shot down a USAF RB-66 that strayed into East German airspace

‘I fired the 23-mm cannon in a rear-quarter attack...

Why the Vigilante is a naval aviator’s favorite US Navy aircraft

‘The “Viggie” was fast as stink—Mach 2 at altitude—and...