The SR-71 mission in the “denied area” where Soviets were test firing the then-new SA-5 “Gammon”

Date:

The SR-71 that flew in the “denied area” where the Soviets were test-firing the SA-5

A symbol of the Cold War, the SR-71 had already spent nearly ten years on the front line by the time it began operating regularly out of RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk, UK. Its role in the theater was straightforward: track Warsaw Pact troop activity along the Iron Curtain and photograph key ports on the Baltic and Barents Seas that housed the Soviet Union’s nuclear-armed submarine fleet. During these crucial sorties, Soviet forces repeatedly attempted to intercept the SR-71 as it cruised at Mach 3, just inside international airspace.

On May 20, 1977, SR-71 64-17958 entered the history books by flying the first operational mission conducted by a Mildenhall-based “Habu.” As recounted by Paul F. Crickmore in his book Lockheed SR-71 Operations in Europe and the Middle East, the aircraft’s pilot, Maj. Tom Alison, later remembered the sortie:

“J T Vida—my RSO—and I arrived at Mildenhall via a KC-135Q, along with the TDY Detachment, Col. Willie Lawson, and the Nav/Planner, Lt. Col. Red Winters. This particular mission was tasked at the Top Secret level using HHR imagery and ELINT sensors against the Soviet submarine base at Murmansk, on the Barents Sea. It was also scheduled as a coordinated mission with an RC-135V ‘Rivet Joint.'”

Top Secret PARPRO

“It was a little unusual for a PARPRO [Peaceful Airborne Reconnaissance Program] mission to be classified Top Secret, but J. T. and I thought that this was because it was a coordinated sortie and one of the first to go into the area around Murmansk. It may also have been due to the fact that the Soviets had deployed SA-5 SAMs around Murmansk, thus making this mission one of the first occasions that the SR-71 had been used in an area where there were known SA-5s. The latter was a much more capable SAM than the earlier SA-2, which was also widely deployed in the USSR and was not considered to pose any great threat to the ‘Habu.'”

“During the mission planning session on 19 May, it was discovered that the Soviets had issued a Notice To Airman (NOTAM) warning of SAM test firing to altitudes in excess of 100,000 ft. The coordinates for the NOTAM area were off the coast of Murmansk, and they nicely bracketed the only patch of sky that we would fly through twice during the mission—going in and coming out. We were always concerned about the Soviet military having intelligence pertaining to our missions prior to them actually being flown, and the issuing of this SAM NOTAM on the eve of our first operational sortie seemed like a highly improbable coincidence. Maybe, somehow, word about our mission had leaked out.”

“Although at the time J. T. and I were not really aware of it, it seems that in some quarters this possible security leak caused quite a bit of concern. Apparently, there were several secure telephone conference calls made between RAF Mildenhall and the SAC SRC, and the discussion centered on whether or not to cancel the mission based on the NOTAM.”

In international airspace at all times

“It should be noted that the mission track was planned so that the SR-71 remained in international airspace at all times. If we stayed on the ‘black line,’ we would never enter Soviet airspace. However, that said, the mission objective was to obtain maximum information concerning the submarine activities and area defenses in this region. At one point during the second pass through the area, the ‘Habu’ was planned to be heading directly at the submarine base, perpendicular to the coastline, at Mach 3.15. We would then commence a high banking turn that would put us parallel to the coastline but headed out of the area. That point was right in the center of the ‘missile-firing box’ outlined by the NOTAM!”

Gammon
S-200V (SA-5 “Gammon”) launcher.

“The concern at SAC HQ centered on whether the Soviets would actually fire an SA-5 against an aircraft in international airspace. ‘Intent’ was always a keyword in a situation like this. Another concern was that the SA-5 was new and relatively unknown in terms of radio frequency (RF) indications and performance. We were later told that Kelly Johnson (the design genius behind the Lockheed SR-71) actually participated in the telephone conference, and his position was that we should not fly the mission. In the end, however, it was determined that the sortie would be flown as scheduled.”

“The following day, we all got airborne on time—the RC-135V, the KG-135Qs, and the ‘Habu.’ Our mission profile was normal through the refuelings, but as we began our climb and acceleration to Mach 3+ cruise prior to entering the target area, it became obvious that the outside temperature was much higher than we expected and were used to. This caused the climb/acceleration to be slower than normal.”

Degraded performance

“It was so hot, and our performance so degraded, that at the point where we should have been level at Mach 3.15 and 75,000 ft, we were just passing 60,000 ft and still climbing at Mach 2.8. As J. T. and I were discussing our situation, he mentioned that the radar sensor had just come on. We had never had it come on while we were still climbing before. Additionally, the slower performance caused us to be well below the planned fuel curve. We had to decide whether to continue with the mission.”

“In the event, we pressed on and finally leveled off at our desired cruise speed. We actually pushed the Mach up a little to try and help ourselves get back on the fuel curve—although I knew we would never be able to make up all of it, I was comfortable that we would be able to get back in the tankers for the next air refueling if nothing else went wrong. And, in fact, that is just what happened. We completed both passes through the target area and the missile firing warning area, with very little reaction noted on our defensive systems. The last air refueling and the trip back to Mildenhall were uneventful, which was just the way we liked it.”

SR-71 in the “denied area” where the Soviets were test-firing the SA-5

“During the debriefing following the flight, we received word that we had already had a very successful mission, and our ‘radar take’ had not even been processed yet. It seemed that the RC-135V “Rivet Joint” that was in the target area for some time before we arrived had had quite a bit of Soviet company in the form of interceptors. Just as we were beginning to enter the area, the RC-135V crew became aware that the fighters had abruptly departed, and the linguists monitoring the radios overheard the Soviet ground control intercept controller trying to vector the interceptors onto the SR-71. At least one fighter pilot was heard to say, ‘I can see the contrail above and ahead. It is climbing at a very high speed, and I will not be able to catch it.’ Heck, we already knew that!”

“Further adding to the initial success of the mission was the first-ever capture of RF signals associated with the SA-5, which were picked up by both our systems and the SIGINT equipment in the RC-135V. J T and I had spent 45 minutes in the ‘denied area,’ most of it at a little in excess of Mach 3—just another day at the office.”

Lockheed SR-71 Operations in Europe and the Middle East is published by Osprey Publishing and is available to order here.

Photo by U.S. Air Force, Lockheed Martin, and George Chernilevsky via Wikipedia

Till Daisd
Till Daisdhttps://www.aviation-wings.com
Till is an aviation enthusiast and blogger who has been writing since 2013. He began by sharing personal reflections and book reviews and gradually expanded his blog to cover a wide range of aviation topics. Today, his website features informative articles and engaging stories about the world of aviation, making it a valuable resource for both pilots and curious enthusiasts alike.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

George ‘Bud’ Day, the first jet pilot to survive a ‘parachute-less’ ejection

In the search for an appropriate call sign for...

Cobra vs Apache: Two of the world’s premier attack helicopters

Firepower, speed, logistics, and doctrine—how the AH-1Z Viper and...

The Fiat G.91R fighter bombers operated by the Portuguese Air Force in Angola

None of the Fiat G.91R fighter bombers were deployed...