Why the MiG-25 Foxbat was never as fast as the SR-71 (and why Soviets never developed their own Blackbird)

Date:

The MiG-25 (NATO reporting name “Foxbat”) could outrun any fighter in the air, and indeed any military aircraft other than the SR-71 Blackbird.

In the late 1960s, the Soviet Union disclosed the existence of an aircraft that seemed to be the most lethal fighter in the world, the MiG-25 (with the NATO reporting name “Foxbat”). This aircraft was capable of surpassing the speed of any fighter in the sky, as well as any military aircraft aside from the SR-71 Blackbird.

The development of the MiG-25 has at different times been linked to the threat posed by either the B-70 Valkyrie or the SR-71.

Even after the cancellation of the B-70, the Foxbat’s development and production continued. As detailed by Lou Drendel in his book “SR-71 Blackbird In Action,” the Habu presented a significantly greater threat, given its proven capability to maintain cruising speeds exceeding Mach 3 at altitudes over 80,000 feet.

The MiG-25 has consistently evoked a sense of mystery similar to that of the Blackbird, being hailed as unbeatable at times while at other moments being regarded as almost outdated in its methods for achieving high speed and altitude in flight.

But what prevented the Soviets from developing their own version of the “SR-71” and creating a competing warplane to the Blackbird?

‘The Soviets built the MiG-25,’ says Iain McClatchie, an aviation expert, on Quora.

Here’s why the MiG-25 Foxbat was never as fast as the SR-71 (and why Soviets never developed their own Blackbird)

‘Notice how huge those air intakes are? Compare that against a Mach 2 airplane:

MiG-29K Fulcrum

‘Dynamic pressure is what holds the aircraft up and causes drag. It scales with air density linearly and with velocity SQUARED.

‘Air mass flow rate through the engines is what is needed for thrust. It scales linearly with air density and velocity.

‘Since the wing works with dynamic pressure, dynamic pressure can’t vary more than a factor of 5 or so during the flight. So, if you want to go fast, you have to go high, where the air is less dense. For mass flow to keep up with drag, you’ll need big, fat intakes. These won’t work well at lower speeds.

‘The moment we saw the MiG-25, we knew it was designed to go fast like an SR-71/A-12, whose intakes are each nearly the size of the fuselage.

The story of the sealed letter signed by a VIP that granted extra help to an SR-71 Blackbird crew after an emergency landing in a small air base in South Korea

‘The other problem that a high and fast jet faces is hidden. The engine intake slows the air to subsonic flow before it goes into the compressor. The air’s kinetic energy turns into heat… the temperature rise goes as the SQUARE of velocity. The engine then compresses the air (heating it further) and subsequently adds a lot of heat before expanding it through the turbine. The turbine has to survive air heated in all three ways.’

McClatchie continues,

‘The J58 engine in the SR-71 was the first engine to use directionally solidified turbine blades, which were able to resist creep at higher temperatures than any blades before them. This is a critical technology. Without high-temperature turbine blades, you cannot make a jet engine fast.

‘In fact, the SR-71 and MiG-25 are both thermally rather than power limited. Both have the reserve power to climb (rapidly) at full speed. Their speed is limited by the temperature of their turbines and not by power.

‘(These days, most turbine engines have hollow turbine blades, with “cooler” air from the compressor blown through them and out tiny holes in their leading edges. The air forms a film over the blade, insulating it from the heat of the surrounding gas. Neither the SR-71 nor the MiG-25 had these blades. Neither did we have the ceramic coatings we use today. These changes would have enabled an operating speed increase, but probably not more than Mach 3.6 or so).

‘As it turns out, the Soviets did not have the technology to make blades that could tolerate as high temperatures as the J58 turbine. As a result, the MiG-25 flew slower than the SR-71 (Mach 2.83 rather than Mach 3.4), and its engine did not last the 400 hours between overhauls that the J58 managed.’

McClatchie concludes,

‘That speed limit, btw, is a very abrupt speed limit. NASA squeezed a tiny performance increase out of the SR-71 by reducing engine life from 400 to 50 hours. A MiG-25 was tracked at Mach 3.2 over the Sinai in March 1971. That speed excursion would have only lasted minutes, and the engines were scrapped after the flight.’

Check out Habubrat’s Facebook page for further Blackbird photos and stories.

Photo by NASA, U.S. Navy, Alex Beltyukov and Dmitriy Pichugin via Wikipedia

Till Daisd
Till Daisdhttps://www.aviation-wings.com
Till is an aviation enthusiast and blogger who has been writing since 2013. He began by sharing personal reflections and book reviews and gradually expanded his blog to cover a wide range of aviation topics. Today, his website features informative articles and engaging stories about the world of aviation, making it a valuable resource for both pilots and curious enthusiasts alike.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

George ‘Bud’ Day, the first jet pilot to survive a ‘parachute-less’ ejection

In the search for an appropriate call sign for...

Cobra vs Apache: Two of the world’s premier attack helicopters

Firepower, speed, logistics, and doctrine—how the AH-1Z Viper and...

The Fiat G.91R fighter bombers operated by the Portuguese Air Force in Angola

None of the Fiat G.91R fighter bombers were deployed...