Why the Vigilante is a naval aviator’s favorite US Navy aircraft

Date:

‘The “Viggie” was fast as stink—Mach 2 at altitude—and I always felt it was just a beautiful, sexy airplane,’ Andy Burns, US Naval Aviator.

The Vigilante, designed and built for the U.S. Navy by North American Aircraft Division at Columbus, Ohio, was the only Mach 2 bomber to serve aboard a Navy carrier. Initially designated the A3J-1 attack bomber, it was one of the largest and heaviest aircraft ever accepted for service aboard U.S. Navy carriers. Production started in 1956, and squadron service began in June 1961. The Navy redesignated it as the A-5 and achieved full deployment by August 1962, when the USS Enterprise, the Navy’s first nuclear aircraft carrier, made its inaugural cruise.

Changing defense strategies marked a change of focus away from carrier-based, heavy-attack squadrons. In 1964, the military reconfigured all the Vigilantes as reconnaissance aircraft and designated them RA-5C. What had been the Vigilante’s bomb bay became the mounting location for reconnaissance gear. Other modifications allowed the RA-5C to carry four external fuel tanks. According to Boeing, these additions increased the airplane’s range on reconnaissance missions and allowed it to keep its attack capability with externally mounted bombs and rockets.

The combination of the RA-5C Vigilante’s ability to deliver conventional weapons, day or night in all kinds of weather, as well as to complete tactical reconnaissance missions, and its sleek design made it one of the most versatile and beautiful aircraft in the world, as Andy Burns, Flight Officer / Aviator at United States Navy (1995-present), explains on Quora.

‘I always loved the RA-5 Vigilante.

‘Originally designed as a carrier-based, high-speed strategic nuclear bomber, it was a failure in that role, but proved quite successful as a reconnaissance aircraft during the Vietnam War.

‘The “Viggie” was fast as stink—Mach 2 at altitude—and I always felt it was just a beautiful, sexy airplane.’

Burns continues:

‘The Viggie was considered a failure as a bomber essentially because it had a ‘revolutionary’ weapons delivery system that didn’t work very well at all, to the point of being hazardous to the crew.

‘The A-5, as originally designed, was intended to be able to deliver its nukes in a high-speed “dash” that would preclude either carrying them externally or using a conventional bomb bay. The solution was a unique “linear delivery” system where the weapons (along with extra fuel tanks) were carried in a centerline tube and ejected from a port between the exhaust nozzles.

‘Cool in theory. In practice, the payload tended to get caught in the jet’s slipstream and either tumble uncontrollably or, more distressing for the crew, follow the jet along for a bit. Either way, it made for unacceptable delivery accuracy, even by nuclear weapons standards.’

Burns concludes:

‘As the RA-5, the “tube” contained only fuel tanks, vital for gas-guzzling turbojets. On a couple of occasions, however, the fuel tanks were rattled loose during a shipboard catapult launch and tumbled out, with some alarmingly spectacular results.’

Naval Aviator explains why the Iconic Vigilante is his favorite US Navy Aircraft

Photo by U.S. Navy

Till Daisd
Till Daisdhttps://www.aviation-wings.com
Till is an aviation enthusiast and blogger who has been writing since 2013. He began by sharing personal reflections and book reviews and gradually expanded his blog to cover a wide range of aviation topics. Today, his website features informative articles and engaging stories about the world of aviation, making it a valuable resource for both pilots and curious enthusiasts alike.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Why Cold War USAF Eagle drivers loved RCAF CF-18’s fake canopy

RCAF CF-18s feature several differences compared to standard F/A-18As,...

A-4 Scooter vs MiG-17 Fresco: America’s only Skyhawk air kill

The Navy’s F-4 and F-8 squadrons were the main...

F-15 vs F-14 vs CF-188: Eagle, Tomcat, and Canadian Hornet in dissimilar combat

Much was made of the F-15 Eagle’s prowess as...